USPTO serial 79111646
SIGNTHESYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4430418Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2013
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIGNTHESYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-73370 LE BOURGET DU LAC, FR
F-73370 LE BOURGET DU LAC, FR
F-73370 LE BOURGET DU LAC, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole K. McLaughlin
NICOLE K MCLAUGHLIN DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices generating random sequences, namely, computers and computer software for generating random sequences, namely, computer software and firmware for operating system programs, computer software development tools, computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer software for encryption; computer software for organizing and viewing digital images and photographs; electronic devices for image acquisition, namely, opto electronical devices, namely, scanners, charge-coupled devices, semiconductor devices, and linear electric sensors, computers, digital photo image converters; electronic devices for the signature extraction from material, namely, opto electronical devices, namely, scanners, charge-coupled devices, semiconductor devices, computers, digital photo image converters, "computers" is a duplicate entry and should be deleted or differentiated from the previous entry in the clause., digital film scanner; electronic devices for reading or measuring physico-chemical characteristics of material, namely, opto electronical devices, namely, scanners, charge-coupled devices, semiconductor devices, and linear electric sensors, computers, digital photo image converters, laser scanners for industrial inspection; electronic devices for generating visual cryptography, namely, computers; computer software and computer hardware for generating identifiers, authenticating goods and individuals, and data securisation, which is all compatible with visual recognition technology; computer software and computer hardware for generating visual cryptography; computer software and computer hardware for generating series of labels, for generating material, digital or electronic security labels with memories with or without microprocessors, for identifying, authenticating goods and individuals, and for data securisation; identifier readers in the nature of electronic card readers; optical readers, optical character readers, opto electronical devices, namely, scanners, charge-coupled devices, semiconductor devices, and linear electric sensors, for authenticating goods and individuals, for authenticating secure data, which are compatible with visual recognition technology; computer software and computer hardware for the acquisition, projection, and combination of security labels, which are compatible with visual recognition technology; devices and apparatus for the indexing of material or electronic security labels, namely, computers and computer hardware for indexing material and for indexing electronic security labels; devices and apparatus for database management of digital security labels, namely, computers, computer hardware; apparatus for recording, transmitting, reproducing images; magnetic or electronic recording media, namely, blank magnetic data carriers, electronic data recorders; bar-code or graphic code readers; all of the above goods designed for generating identifiers, authenticating goods and individuals, and for data securisation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Blank or partially printed paper labels, namely, security labels of paper, cardboard, or derivatives or assimilates comprised primarily of paper or cardboard; graphic codes in the nature of graphic prints and representations, printed reports featuring graphic codes and optical machine readable codes for identifying, authenticating goods and individuals, and for data securisation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of visual cryptography labels, design of encrypted labels, design of encoded labels, design of computer software, graphic arts, graphic prints and representations, printed reports featuring graphic codes and optical machine readable codes; design of random sequence generator computer software; design of computer software for generating images or labels containing secret information shared via material; data encryption and decoding services, computer services, namely, data recovery services and encrypted data recovery services; engineering services in the field of tattooing of labels on material; design of opto electrical devices, namely, scanners, CCD and CMO's arrays and linear sensors and computer software for identifying and for authenticating materials, material goods, manufactured goods, documents, activity in the nature of access control and individuals, which is compatible with visual recognition technology; engineering services in the field of indexing of material or electronic security labels; quality control for others in the field of material or electronic security labels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIGNOPTIC TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by SIGNOPTIC TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks owned by SIGNOPTIC TECHNOLOGIES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIGNTHESYS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |