USPTO serial 79111680
ESSENZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4449405Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2013
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSENZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A Nelson
Jeffrey A Nelson SpyHop Law PLLC4412 California Ave SW, #16722Seattle, WA 98116UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting articles and apparatus, namely, skis, ski poles, ski bindings; parts for these sporting equipment and articles, namely, climbing skins with fur naps and non-metal crampons, all sold as a unit for use in ski mountaineering; containers adapted for skis, namely, carrying bags and sleeves; all of the foregoing included in class 28 and excluding snowboard goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marker Dalbello Völkl (International) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Marker Völkl (International) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Marker Völkl (International) GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ESSENZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |