Drawing for MIX CITY

USPTO serial 79111771

MIX CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4311110Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 2, 2013
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIX CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs; computer application game software for mobile phones and handheld electronic devices; electronic game software; electronic game software for mobile phones and handheld electronic devices; electronic publications, namely, books, magazines and manuals featuring computer games recorded on computer media; downloadable electronic publications, namely, books, magazines and manuals in the field of computer gamesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment, namely, providing online games; electronic games services provided by means of the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users via mobile phones and computers; entertainment services, namely, provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing information on providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users via mobile phones and computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 12, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 17, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 2, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 2, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 31, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance