USPTO serial 79111801
PARTY FOR A CAUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARTY FOR A CAUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund raising; information services relating to charitable fund raising, financial planning and management; advice and support on financial planning and financial management matters; bringing together, for the benefit of others, a variety of goods for viewing and prospective purchase | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; party planning; electronic publication of information on a wide range of topics, including online and over a global computer network; game services provided online; electronic publication of news; providing information, including online, about education, training, entertainment, sporting and cultural activities; providing online electronic publications (not downloadable); provision of education services via an online forum; provision of entertainment services via an online forum; publication of multimedia material online; weblog (blog) services (online publication of journals or diaries); production of webcasts; education services; publication services; organisation of lectures, presentations, live broadcasts, tutorials, seminars and shows; publication of books, texts, magazines, pamphlets and printed matter; sound recording, film and video production and distribution services; arranging and conducting of seminars, conferences and exhibitions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 10, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |