Drawing for KOMPOGAS

USPTO serial 79111946

KOMPOGAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4333287Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 14, 2013
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KOMPOGAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Nowak

Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and parts of machines for industrial use in the treatment and methanisation of organic waste and production of biogas and digester's sludge, namely, digesters, cranes, shredders, agitators for organic sludge, discharge pumpsACTIVE—
037Installation, assembly, repair, servicing and maintenance of installations and machines for the treatment of organic waste for the production of biogas and digester's sludgeACTIVE—
042Engineering and engineering consultation services, namely, development, technical planning and testing of equipment in connection with the setting up and operation of installations and machines for the treatment of organic waste for the production of biogas and digester's sludgeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 28, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 28, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 7, 2023PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
May 12, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2023PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jan 6, 2023PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Nov 22, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 14, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 5, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 19, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 14, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 31, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 15, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 14, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 1, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 2, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Jan 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 7, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 10, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance