Drawing for KITAGAWA

USPTO serial 79112026

KITAGAWA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4290715Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2013
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with KITAGAWA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoichiro Yamaguchi

Yoichiro Yamaguchi Michael Best & Friedrich LLP1000 Maine Avenue, S.W.SUITE 400Washington, DC 20024

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power chucks for lathes; power-operated chucks for lathes; scroll-chucks for lathes; independent chucks for lathes; chucks for lathe; power-operated vises for metalworking machines; vises for metalworking machines; work piece grippers for metalworking machines; work piece holders for metalworking machines; work grippers for metalworking machines; grippers for metalworking machines; rotary cylinders for lathes; cylinders for lathes; rotary tables for metalworking machines; robotic work piece holders for metalworking machines; robotic work piece manipulators for metalworking machines; manipulators for metalworking machines; robotic hands for metalworking machines; robotic handling apparatus for metalworking machines [ ; concrete mixers; concrete production plant, namely, a machine used for mixing concrete; batcher plant, namely, a machine used for mixing concrete; cable cranes; jib cranes; mobile cranes; bridge cranes; tower cranes; crawler cranes; derricks; gantry cranes; winches; windlasses; capstans for machines; agitators for chemical processing; mixing and blending machines for chemical processing; sorting machines for chemical processing; granulating machines for chemical processing; kneading machines for chemical processing; disintegrators for chemical processing; cake-fodder crushing machines; feed mills ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2024INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 11, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 8, 2024INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 8, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 19, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 9, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Nov 29, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2013ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 11, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 10, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance