USPTO serial 79112056
ARPLEXAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4348495Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2013
- Examiner
- MITTLER, KEVIN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARPLEXAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca B. Lederhouse
Rebecca B. Lederhouse Baker & McKenzie LLPSuite 5000300 E. Randolph StreetChicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |