USPTO serial 79112116
E-HORIZON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-HORIZON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic notice boards, computer software for use in telecommunications, namely telecommunications software to enable transmission, access, organization and management of text messaging, instant messaging, text and images via the Internet and other communications networks; intercommunication apparatus, namely, intercoms, cellular phones, computer touch screens; modems; computer operating programs recorded on CD-ROM and flash drives; blank integrated circuit cards, namely smart cards; telephone apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, computer aided transmission of messages and images, communications by computer terminals, electronic mail, facsimile transmission, communication by fiber optic networks; communications by telephone, electronic message sending, satellite transmission, telephone communications services, television broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of the design and development of computer hardware and computer software; computer programming; computer software design; computer systems analysis; research in the field of physics; updating and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |