Drawing for ADRIA

USPTO serial 79112211

ADRIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADRIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and deer, canned, dry and boiled fruit and vegetable, jam, jelly, dairy productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, coffee substitutes, cakes, desserts, candy, ice cream, honey, salt, vinegar, sauces, spices, chocolatesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2013PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 28, 2013PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 20, 2013PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 22, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 20, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance