Drawing for RIDOLFI

USPTO serial 79112262

RIDOLFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4303307Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 19, 2013
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIDOLFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oil for foodSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033WinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 20, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 6, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 19, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 30, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 30, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 1, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 19, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 4, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 3, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 17, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance