USPTO serial 79112307
REGENERANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGENERANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations containing bacteria for use in treating gynecological diseases; medical preparations, namely, freeze-dried bacteria sold as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for treating gynecological diseases, diseases associated with an imbalance in vaginal flora; sanitary preparations for medical purposes, namely, freeze-dried bacteria for use in manufacturing biological preparations for treating gynecological disorders; biological preparations for pharmaceutical, medical and sanitary purposes, namely, bacteria that are probiotics, tribiotics, designed to treat gynecological diseases; preparations containing bacteria for medical purposes, namely, antifungals, antimycotics; bacterial probiotics in capsules, for pharmaceutical purposes for treating diseases associated with an imbalance in the vaginal flora; Pharmaceutical preparations in the form of vaginal capsules containing bacteria for treating gynecological diseases; All purpose disinfectants for sanitary monitoring of patients suffering from gynecological diseases, imbalance of the vaginal flora; soap without soap for gynecological purposes, namely, soap whose ingredients are gentle to the skin | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |