Drawing for MAXIMUM FIANDRE EXTRALITE

USPTO serial 79112323

MAXIMUM FIANDRE EXTRALITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4326355Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 30, 2013
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MAXIMUM FIANDRE EXTRALITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Tingey

David B. Tingey Kirton McConkie36 S. State Street, #1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, marble, granite and stone for covering walls and floors; non-metallic building tiles; ceramic tiles; materials for covering floors including coverings of ceramic and stoneware, namely, ceramic tiles and stone tiles for floor and wall coveringACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 7, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 24, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 28, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 31, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 4, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 27, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance