USPTO serial 79112627
CAOTECH GRINDING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4239967Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2012
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CAOTECH GRINDING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NH Wormerveer, NL
NL-1521 NH Wormerveer, NL
NL-1521 NH Wormerveer, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, pulverizing machines, conching machines for conching chocolate masses and chocolate coatings and cocoa bean and cocoa masses; mechanical mixing machines for premixing of chocolate and coating masses and cocoa bean and cocoa masses; [ positive displacement pumps for cocoa masses, chocolate and coatings in the nature of crystal and powdered sugar; ] and spare parts for the aforementioned machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, installation, repair and construction of machines, namely, pulverizing machines, conching machines, mixing machines, pumps and components for the aforementioned machines, and storage tanks for chocolate, cocoa and foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Design and development of machines, namely, pulverizing machines, conching machines, mixing machines, pumps and components for the aforementioned machines and storage tanks for chocolate, cocoa and foodstuffs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caotech B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Caotech B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Caotech B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CAOTECH GRINDING TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |