USPTO serial 79112651
SRG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4287370Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2013
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SRG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
88074 Meckenbeuren, DE
SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
88074 Meckenbeuren, DE
SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
88074 Meckenbeuren, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power chucks for machine tools and structural parts therefor; machine tools and machine tool components, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; steady rests, namely, electrically operated steady rests in the nature of lathes; electric, hydraulic and pneumatic chucks, steady rests or clamping cylinders in the nature of machine tools, namely, vices for use in the precision clamping of work pieces, clamps for use in the precision clamping of work pieces and jaws for use in the precision clamping of work pieces and structural parts therefor, in particular load cells and dynamometers for determining clamping ratios of chucks and steady rests | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Measuring apparatus for determining the clamping force of chucks; measuring apparatus and load cells for measuring clamping force ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Measuring the clamping force of machine tools or steady rests ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SMW-AUTOBLOK Spannsysteme GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SRG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |