CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OBA

USPTO serial 79112692

OBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4336710Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 21, 2013
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned fruits and vegetables, peeled tomatoes, tomato juice for cooking; tomato pasteSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Pepper paste, ketchup, mayonnaise, tomato sauceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 19, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 9, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 8, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 21, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 27, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 21, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 21, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 24, 2014FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 6, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 21, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 11, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 1, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 24, 2012SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance