Drawing for BISO

USPTO serial 79112715

BISO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4394339Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 3, 2013
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BISO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Anna McCoy

B. Anna McCoy McCoy Russell LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines and machine operated agricultural implements, namely, cutting units for agricultural machines, mowers for agricultural machines, combine headers for agricultural machines, cutting attachments for agricultural machines, maize attachments for agricultural machines, sunflower headers for agricultural machines, cutting unit trolleys; feed cutters, forage harvesters, horizontal choppers in the nature of maize horizontal choppers, track harvesters, chaff spreaders, vegetable washers, straw mills, straw bale spreadersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Trucks, dump trucksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 22, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 22, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 3, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 3, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 18, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 3, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance