USPTO serial 79112960
LIFUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2012
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LIFUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
Guangming New District, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
Guangming New District, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
Alex Patel PATEL & ALMEIDA PC22543 Ventura Blvd, Suite 220 #1200Woodland Hills, CA 91364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ material for electricity, namely, electric wires and cables; ] lighting ballasts; [ commutators; transmitters of electronic signals; ] battery chargers; integrated circuits; [ electric apparatus for commutation; ] electric light dimmers regulators; electricity inverters [; stabilized voltage power supply ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | lamps; street lamps; [ electric lamps; flares; ] lights for vehicles; lighting apparatus for vehicles; [ safety lamps for underground use; miner's lamps; ] daylight fluorescent lamp tubes; lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Ledfriend Optoelectronics; Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Lifud Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named LIFUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |