Drawing for ONLY ONE QUALITY, THE FINEST

USPTO serial 79113002

ONLY ONE QUALITY, THE FINEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4248166Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 27, 2012
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ONLY ONE QUALITY, THE FINEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NANCY DICONZA

Nancy DiConza FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Champagne; sparkling winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 27, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 9, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 16, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 26, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance