USPTO serial 79113138
VISOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4284471Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2013
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with VISOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Ter., Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Optical and electronic apparatuses and devices for analogue and digital recording, transmission, processing, displaying of tone and pictures, especially of still and moving pictures, namely, photographic cameras, motion picture cameras, video cameras, wireless communication devices for transmitting images taken by a camera; analogue or digital range finder cameras, single lens reflex cameras, compact cameras, cameras in the nature of camera modules for mobile phones, cinema picture taking and cinema picture displaying devices, namely, cinematographic machines and apparatus, motion picture camera, cinematographic cameras, projection screens for movie films, cinematographic projectors; video cameras; camcorder; scanner; Accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely, digital camera accessory in the nature of a digital photo viewer, bags for cameras and photographic equipment; tripods; containers specially adapted for cameras, video cameras, and camcorders: lenses for cameras, namely, objective lenses; optical filters; magnifying glasses; camera flashes, namely, flash devices for photography; camera closures and shutters, namely, apertures; adapter devices, namely, adapter rings for attaching objectives on cameras; ] viewfinder, especially optical and optoelectronical viewfinders for cameras [ ; computer software and firmware for the use in analogue and digital picture- and tone recording devices, specially for capturing and editing pictures and sound in cameras ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |