Drawing for MINDLINK

USPTO serial 79113155

MINDLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4287376Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2013
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive computer software for managing communications between multiple computer applications, and for managing personal data and interpersonal communications within a business and between persons within multiple businesses; interactive video software for facilitating employee communications within a business; project management software for management of business processes; computer software, pre-recorded on CD-ROM or downloaded from the Internet, to enable users to communicate, store, retrieve, access and share computer content, namely, electronic documents, files, videos, spreadsheets, programs and applications, for project management purposes and for business communication purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Provision of communication facilities in the nature of digital network telecommunications services for the interchange of electronic data, documents, files, videos, spreadsheets, programs, and applications data by electronic means; communication between computers, namely, communications by computer terminals; communication by electronic mail services; communication by electronic means, namely, information transmission via electronic communications networks; communication of electronic documents, files, videos, spreadsheets, programs, Applications, and database information by means of telecommunications networks; communication services for the electronic transmission of data; communication services for the electronic transmission of documents, files, videos, spreadsheets, programs, and applications via computer terminals; telecommunications consultancy; video conferencing services; electronic communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic messaging services; provision of access to electronic messaging systems; electronic data transmissionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Advisory services relating to the use of computer software; calibration services relating to computer software; computer software consultancy; computer software programming services; computer software rental services; installation and maintenance of computer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 12, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 7, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 12, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 24, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 24, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 16, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 16, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance