Drawing for PHYTOLIFT

USPTO serial 79113389

PHYTOLIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4344715Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 4, 2013
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOLIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

BORIS UMANSKY LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. MICHIGAN AVE.STE. 1600CHICAGO, IL

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and non-medicated toiletries[ ; soaps and detergents; adhesives for affixing false hair; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; dentifrices; perfumery, fragrances and incenses; false nails; false eyelashes ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005[ Dietary supplements consisting primarily of collagen; dietary supplements consisting primarily of placentas ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 4, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 26, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 31, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 24, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 201971.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 19, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2019PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 12, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 31, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 19, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 9, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 7, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 21, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2012RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2012RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jul 3, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 3, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2012RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jun 29, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance