Drawing for ISOTROPIX

USPTO serial 79113587

ISOTROPIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4344723Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 4, 2013
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISOTROPIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in relation to digital animation and visual effects; video game and computer game software; and software for creating content for blank digital storage media, namely, computer software for digital image processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Installation and configuration of computer software; development of computer software and computer software applications; testing and evaluation of computer software and software applications of others for the purpose of certificationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 28, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 16, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 15, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 4, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 12, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 8, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 29, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 2, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 6, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 22, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance