Drawing for CLARISSE

USPTO serial 79113588

CLARISSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4452844Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 24, 2013
Examiner
BERNS, LEE ANNE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARISSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in relation to digital animation and visual effects; video game and computer game software; and software for creating content for blank digital storage media, namely, computer software for digital image processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 31, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 12, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 1, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 27, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 3, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 24, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 8, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 13, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 25, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance