USPTO serial 79113594
NO-NÀ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NO-NÀ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley
Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John Street - Suite 403New York, NY 10038-3242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, trousers, pants, dresses, suits, skirts, miniskirts, coats, pullovers, jumpers, sweaters, jackets, blazers, blouses, shorts, shirts, t-shirts, polo-shirts, robes, swimsuits, swimwear, beachrobes, beachwear, Bermuda shorts, leggings, underwear, belts, neckties, ties, bandanas, foulards, scarves, wristbands, waistcoats, hats, caps, socks, shoes, slippers and boots | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |