Drawing for PAXMAN

USPTO serial 79113960

PAXMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAXMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Ladenheim

Matthew Ladenheim TREGO, HINS & LADENHEIM, PLLC9300 Harris Corners ParkwaySuite 210Charlotte, NC 28269

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental and veterinary use; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, medical apparatus and instruments for cooling body parts and/or medical apparatus and instruments for use to minimize hair loss following chemotherapy; medical cooling devices, namely, medical cooling devices for cooling body parts and/or medical cooling devices for use to minimize hair loss following chemotherapy; apparatus for cooling humans scalps, apparatus for cooling parts of the human body, apparatus for cooling human organs, apparatus for cooling the human body and structural parts and accessories for the aforesaidSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance