Drawing for 88 RUE DU RHONE

USPTO serial 79114091

88 RUE DU RHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 88 RUE DU RHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, timepieces and chronometric instruments and parts thereof included in this class; the aforementioned goods from Geneva; precious stones from Switzerland; precious metals and their alloysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 28, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 18, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 2, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance