Drawing for ULTRASILK

USPTO serial 79114095

ULTRASILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4319406Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 16, 2013
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRASILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frederick W. Meyers

Frederick W. Meyers Ladas & Parry LLP224 South Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Syringes for injections; volumetric pump devices for medical use, namely, for administering injections and filling syringes, specifically for pumping dermal implants into the skin; dermal implants consisting of artificial materials, namely, visco supplementation substances for medical use for wrinkle filling or volume increasingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 5, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 22, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 16, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 16, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 26, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 19, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance