Drawing for NOGLUT

USPTO serial 79114145

NOGLUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4322651Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 23, 2013
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOGLUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieron425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNew York, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat and meat products, namely, charcuterie and prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit puree; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 29, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 29, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 23, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance