Drawing for BERNARD MAGREZ LES CLÉS DE L'EXCELLENCEBM BERNARD MAGREZ

USPTO serial 79114345

BERNARD MAGREZ LES CLÉS DE L'EXCELLENCEBM BERNARD MAGREZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4299824Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 12, 2013
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BERNARD MAGREZ LES CLÉS DE L'EXCELLENCEBM BERNARD MAGREZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farzad A. Panjshiri

Farzad A. Panjshiri Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033AOC wines (wines with protected appellation of origin)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 26, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Feb 26, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 27, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Mar 20, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 20, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 12, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 14, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 18, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance