Drawing for CLOUDZZ

USPTO serial 79114454

CLOUDZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUDZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Bouncer chairs for babies and young children; swing chairs for babies and young children; chairs and armchairs for babies and young children; beds and cradles for babies and young childrenSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 24, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 15, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 18, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 21, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance