USPTO serial 79114566
NEV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4374072Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2013
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEV KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu
L. Jeremy Craft and Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 Heights BoulevardHouston, TX 77008-6918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys; jewelry made of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, bracelets, rings, charms, necklaces, ear clips, cuff-links, earrings, ornamental pins, tie pins, pendants, rings being jewelry, medallions, and brooches; ornaments of precious metal in the nature of jewelry; trinkets of precious metal, namely, bracelets, rings, charms, necklaces, ear clips, cuff-links, earrings, ornamental pins, tie pins, pendants, rings being jewelry, medallions, and brooches; statues of precious metal, busts of precious metal; jewellery, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by NEV KUYUMCULUK; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named NEV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |