Drawing for KUPILKA

USPTO serial 79114628

KUPILKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4402114Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 17, 2013
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KUPILKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey J. Banyas

Jeffrey J. Banyas Edwin A. Sisson, Attorney at Law, LLC303 N. Court St., PO Box 867Medina, OH 44258UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cups, plates, soup bowlsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2022DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 17, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 27, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 13, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 17, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 21, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance