Drawing for C R Y S T A L I N E

USPTO serial 79114634

C R Y S T A L I N E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4329978Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 7, 2013
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with C R Y S T A L I N E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B STREET, SUITE 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthodontic brackets; orthodontic bands; orthodontic tubes; orthodontic wires; orthodontic lingual buttons; orthodontic appliancesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 22, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 7, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 16, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 15, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 26, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 7, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 7, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 24, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 23, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance