USPTO serial 79114883
DFD DENSE FLUID DEGREASING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4464380Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 2014
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DFD DENSE FLUID DEGREASING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
MICHAEL W GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREETSUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, cleaning machines, degreasing machines, namely, for degreasing metal and polymer parts, debinding machines, filters declogging machines, dry cleaning machines; leather dressing machines, namely, fullers; motors and engines other than for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components other than for land vehicles; automatic handling machines, namely, automatic conveyers, palletizers, case elevators, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machines; packaging or packing machines; pumps and compressors in the nature of machines for pressurization; washing machines, namely, clothes washing machines, dish washing machines; industrial robots in the nature of machines; elevators | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Heaters for autoclaves; heaters for gas separators; refrigerators; coolers for autoclaves; coolers for gas separators; dryers for autoclaves; ventilators for parts cleaning machines and for dry cleaning machines; sterilizers for medical devices and sterilizers for filters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Laundering; restoration of clothing; care, cleaning and repair of leather or fur; office machine and equipment installation, maintenance and repair; machinery installation, maintenance and repair; installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROSSIGNOL Dominique
- Other trademarks owned by ROSSIGNOL Dominique
- Other trademarks owned by ROSSIGNOL Dominique
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named DFD DENSE FLUID DEGREASING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |