Drawing for ROTATED ARC TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 79115018

ROTATED ARC TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTATED ARC TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anessa Owen Kramer

39400 WOODWARD AVE STE 101HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWATZ AND COHEN LLPBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for mixing high viscosity fluids and chemicals; mixing machines for use in the food, confectionary, dairy, food and beverage, and personal care industries; and parts and fittings thereof for the aforementioned mixing machines, namely, replacement parts, bearings, blades, cylindersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 8, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 4, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 2, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance