USPTO serial 79115024
RUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4669082Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2015
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
Aalen-Unterkochen, DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Stone
Mark P. Stone LAW OFFICE OF MARK P STONE27 Waters EdgeChappaqua, NY 10514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Non-slipping devices for footwear, namely, cleats, non-slip soles and chains to be attached to shoes to facilitate walking on snow, ice, mud and other slippery surfaces | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten; Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named RUD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2014 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |