USPTO serial 79115085
APP BRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4390024Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 2013
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APP BRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo 141-8672, JP
Tokyo 141-8672, JP
Tokyo 141-8672, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Woodbury
Scott A. Woodbury WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 East South Temple, Suite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, namely, downloadable software for connecting a network to a cloud computing environment and monitoring and controlling the connection in the field of cloud computing; computer programs recorded on data media for connecting a network to a cloud computing environment and monitoring and controlling the connection in the field of cloud computing; computer peripheral devices; measuring and testing machines and instruments, namely, lasers for measuring purposes, measuring tapes and battery testers; telecommunication devices and apparatus, namely, computer hardware for telecommunications; electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, computers and database processors; electronic publications in the nature of pamphlets, leaflets and manuals of products in the field of computing and cloud computing, downloadable and recorded on computer media | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Providing information concerning commercial sales; providing information concerning commercial sales via e-commerce; advertising and publicity services in the field of e-commerce; business management concerning use of database via Internet; computerized digital data file management and providing information related thereto; computerized file management, namely, computerized file management of electronic data stored into computer databases; compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; consultancy on offering business management assistance in operation of office computer systems and providing information related thereto; compilation of information into computer databases; systemization of information into computer databases; computerized file management; professional business consultancy and business management consultancy; business information | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Monitoring of computer programs and computer systems by remote access; monitoring of computer network systems and computer data by remote access; computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software; rental of computers, central processing units in the nature of processors, electronic circuits recorded with computer programs, magnetic discs recorded with computer programs, magnetic tapes recorded with computer programs, optical discs recorded with computer programs and computer peripheral devices recorded with computer programs; rental of computer programs via communication lines; providing temporary use of non-downloadable application software for connecting a network to a cloud computing environment and monitoring and controlling the connection in the field of cloud computing on a computer server via Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Systems, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Systems, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Hitachi Systems, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APP BRIDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2022 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |