Drawing for ROMAR

USPTO serial 79115107

ROMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4460441Status 708Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 7, 2014
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ROMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Dellenbach

David B. Dellenbach Workman Nydegger60 East South Temple, Suite 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for removing solid and particulate matter from fluids; [ machine tools for removing waste material; ] apparatus and equipment for use in the drilling and operating of oil and gas wells, namely, magnetic systems for separating and removing metallic particles from fluids and down hole returns; apparatus and equipment for use in the construction or completion of oil and gas wells, namely, high magnetic strength separators for forming a magnetic barrier across drilling fluid downhole return in order to separate and remove metallic particles, and magnetic separators for use in catching, collecting recovering and removing swarf and metallic particles and debris from drilling fluids and drilling medium; mechanical apparatus and equipment incorporating magnets for removing metallic particles, debris and contaminants from oil and gas wells; well clean up tools, namely, magnetic separators for separating metallic components from fluids; magnetic apparatus and equipment for use in collecting metal contaminants from drilling fluids; magnetic tools, namely, separators, for removing metallic particles from drilling systems; magnetic separators for industrial use for separating metallic components from fluids; tools, namely, separators, used in the completion of oil wells; [ machine pumps; ] [ replacement parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; ] all the aforementioned excluding bearings, segmental housing, bearing staves and stave bearingsACTIVE—
037[ Oil and gas well drilling and production services, namely, installation, repair and monitoring of slip joint packers on drilling risers to prevent mud spill; well completion services, namely, separation and waste disposal for others of swarf waste, removal of magnetic particles from waste, magnetic separation of magnetic particles, debris and contaminants from drilling fluid, metallic contaminant collection from drilling fluid; well clean-up services; waste disposal for others in the nature of well debris removal; oil and gas well drilling and production services; well cleaning services, namely, removal of metal contaminants from drilling fluids; [ cleaning of well bores; ] well cleaning services, namely, filtering of well fluids; rental and installation of tools and equipment for use in the drilling and operating of oil and gas wells; rental and installation of well cleaning apparatus; rental and hire of mechanical apparatus and equipment incorporating magnets for removing metallic particles, debris and contaminants from oil and gas wells; advisory and consultancy services in the fields of oil and gas well drilling and production, well completion, well debris removal, well cleaning and rental and installation of well cleaning equipment ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 10, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 7, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 7, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2025C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 6, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 19, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 21, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2023REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 20, 2021INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 5, 2021INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 3, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 3, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 3, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 27, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2014FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2014FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 7, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2013GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2013OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 10, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 9, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance