Drawing for ODINE

USPTO serial 79115148

ODINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4299839Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 12, 2013
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ODINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Rollins

Amy Rollins Brannon Sowers & Cracraft PC47 South Meridian Street, Suite 400Indianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and programs for routing, route optimization, addressing, number portability, rating, billing, financial reporting, analytics, and engineering, all for use in telecommunications; none of the above in relation to the process of manufacturing, ordering, delivery or distribution of food productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; digital network telecommunications services; high bit-rate data transmission services for telecommunication network operators; providing access to telecommunication networks; providing electronic telecommunication connections; providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure; telecommunication access services; telecommunications consultation; telecommunications gateway services; telecommunications routing and junction services; transfer of data by telecommunications; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to all the aforesaidSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer project management services in the field of telecommunications; consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; computer systems analysis; interactive communication design services, namely, telecommunication network design services; industrial analysis and research services in the field telecommunications; professional consultancy relating to manufacturing efficiency, namely, consultancy in the field of monitoring telecommunications networks for quality control purposes; computer software development; computer software programming services; installation and maintenance of computer software; technical research relating to telecommunication techniques; advisory, consultancy and information services in relation to all the aforesaidSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 20, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 14, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 29, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 16, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 12, 2022REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 5, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 25, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 12, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 16, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance