USPTO serial 79115212
SOHOCENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOHOCENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Collen IP Intellectual Property Law80 South Highland AvenueTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOssining, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus, instruments and installations; telecommunications peripherals; modems; fibre-optic cables; computers; computer hardware; computer software; computer firmware; computer peripherals; computer programmes; lasers not for medical purposes; microwave apparatus, instruments and installations for telecommunications purposes included in this class; switchboards; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business consultancy services; compilation of information into computer databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Information about telecommunications; consultancy and information in the field of telecommunications; providing of access to the Internet; providing of access to telecommunications networks, including via computer, the telephone or television; providing access to portals on the Internet; communications services for access to information, texts, sound, images and data via communications and computer networks; providing of access to an online portal or an online search engine; online mailbox services; data transmission via telecommunications; services of an Internet provider; e-mail services; telecommunications; providing access to data networks (the Internet) and online message sending services for digital messaging services; transmission and dissemination of data or audiovisual images via a global computer network or the Internet; transmission of information via the Internet; web messaging | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultancy with regard to the design of homepages and Internet pages; hosting of platforms on the Internet; design of computer software; design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of software for providing online advertising and/or advertising on the Internet; design and development of computer hardware and software for operating online services for the preparation or exchange of information via the Internet or for operating search engines or online portals with information offered via the Internet, in particular text data, image data, audio data or video data; design and development of computer hardware and software for operating telecommunications services and digital services, in particular online services for communicating via the Internet by means of text data, image data, audio data, speech data and/or video data; creation, maintenance and updating of a telecommunications network search engine software; hosting websites on the Internet; rental of memory space on the Internet; rental and maintenance of memory space for websites, for others (hosting); rental of web servers; providing of storage space on the Internet; providing memory capacity for external use (webhousing); providing of webspace (webhosting) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |