Drawing for SEASTAR

USPTO serial 79115255

SEASTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SEASTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications and data communication, namely, satellite transmission of location and navigation dataABANDONED—
039Positioning and marine navigation services via satellite and other communication networksABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 24, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 11, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 11, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 19, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 3, 2014OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2014OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 2, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 13, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 4, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 4, 2013CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 30, 2013CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 5, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 10, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2012LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance