USPTO serial 79115255
SEASTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEASTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FNV IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Fugro N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Fugro N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by FNV IP B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named SEASTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |