Drawing for RODRIGO

USPTO serial 79115356

RODRIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RODRIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes; jewellery, precious stones; jewellery, costume jewellery; jewellery cases; horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 10, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 8, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2012CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Aug 28, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 14, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance