USPTO serial 79115365
PREMIER JOAILLIER DE LA PLACE VENDÔME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PREMIER JOAILLIER DE LA PLACE VENDÔME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
Justin R. Young DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; toilet water; eau-de-cologne; deodorants for personal use; essential oils; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for toiletry purposes; soaps; non-medicated toiletries and beauty care milks; cosmetics; make-up and make-up removing products, namely, make-up remover, eye make-up remover; cosmetic preparations for skin and hair care, namely, cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, for the bath, and for skin tanning; beauty masks; hair lotions, cosmetic sets in the nature of make-up kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss; cosmetic creams; incense, incense sticks, after-shave lotions; shaving preparations; nail varnish; shampoos | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; jewelry and precious stones; jewelry made of precious metals or coated therewith, namely rings, bracelets, and necklaces; earrings; brooches; pendants; medals; cuff links, tie pins; key rings of precious metal in the nature of trinkets or fobs; jewelry cases in the nature of caskets; timepieces and chronometric instruments; watches; wristwatches; clocks; chronometers; chronographs for use as watches; watch cases; parts for clocks and watches, namely, movements; watch straps; watch chains; watch glasses; cases for watches, cases for clock and watchmaking; statues and statuettes of precious metal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |