Drawing for WAR CORPS

USPTO serial 79115515

WAR CORPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAR CORPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game programs; computer application game software for mobile phones and handheld electronic devices; electronic game software; electronic game software for mobile phones and handheld electronic devices; electronic publicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Entertainment, namely, providing online games; electronic games services provided by means of the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users via mobile phones and computers; entertainment services, namely, provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing information on providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users via mobile phones and computersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 23, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 23, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance