USPTO serial 79115816
N NFC-ID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4398221Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 10, 2013
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N NFC-ID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen C. Kassner
Maureen C. Kassner Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2005 Market StreetSuite 2200Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, computer hardware; disk drives, namely, computer disk drives, digital disk drives, optical disk drives; encoders and television decoders; modems; programs for computers for reading of chips and the modification for safety of data in the field of payments, finance, telephony, transport, access control, electronic identification, retail and gift card, all to facilitate communication between hand-held electronic devices; encryption and decryption programs for computer data; computer software for the management of database; communication interface cards for data processing equipment in the form of printed circuits; interfaces for computers being communication interface modules for the exchange of data; electronic data converters for data recorded on computer media; chips, namely, integrated circuits; electronic computer chips, namely, contactless interface chips, semiconductor chips, and silicon chips; microcircuits for coding and decoding data; printed circuits; semiconductors; central processing units; microprocessors; microcontrollers; electronic tags, namely, tags for controlling access, management of stock, traceability of goods, and protection against theft; chip cards, namely, blank electronic chip cards; encoded electronic chip cards containing programming for reading, writing, controlling, exchanging and modification of data for use in the field of payment, finance, access, control, transport, ticketing, electronic identification, retail and gift card and mobile communication fields for use with smart cards, key fobs, mobile phones, handheld consumer electronic devices, point of sale displays and PC peripherals; memory cards for electronic audio and video devices, mobile phones, computers, players, and movie and still cameras; electric and electronic locks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | design of computer programs for computers and microprocessors for others, computer system design and development; technical development and research study for data exchange systems and devices, namely, conducting scientific research, conducting technical feasibility studies and new product development for others, personalized study and programming service for chip cards and electronic cards, namely, customization of computer chips cards and electronic cards with integrated circuits for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2023 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |