Drawing for MAXX

USPTO serial 79116001

MAXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew T. Ingersoll

Matthew T. Ingersoll Quarles & Brady LLP300 North LaSalle StreetSuite 4000Chicago, IL 60654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Brakes, namely disc brakes and parts thereof, all the aforesaid goods for commercial vehicles, included in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 25, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 19, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 18, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 17, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance