USPTO serial 79116085
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew M. Smith
Andrew M. Smith Resonate IP, LLCP.O. Box 1650Bend, OR 97709UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-luminous, non-metallic, and non-mechanical coverings for facades; tile coverings for walls and floors; non-metallic floor, wall, facade and ceiling building materials, namely, bathroom tiles and kitchen tiles; and non-metallic kitchen countertops and bathroom countertops; [ clay slabs, ] ceramic slabs, and slabs composed of ceramic surfaces; [ asphalt, pitch and bitumen; transportable buildings not of metal; ] monuments not of metal; non-metallic building materials, namely, marble, quartz, [ glass, xylolith, gypsum, ] stone, slate, granite, concrete, [ brick, ] limestone [ lime, asbestos, clay, and alabaster ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 25, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2023 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |