Drawing for ECHILLER

USPTO serial 79116114

ECHILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWER, MARGARET
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECHILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Glenn

MICHAEL A GLENN PERKINS COIE LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007compressors for heat pumps; rotating systems having magnetic bearings for rotation generation, electric energy generation, current generation, alternating current generation and wind-powered electricity generation comprised of engines not for land vehicles having magnetic bearings, electric generators having magnetic bearings, current generators having magnetic bearings, alternating current generators having magnetic bearings and wind-powered electricity generators having magnetic bearingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Electric or electronic control or regulating apparatus and instruments, namely, controls for regulating or controlling electric current in heat pumps; power electronic devices, apparatuses and instruments for switching, converting, regulating and controlling electricitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011installations for use of energy, storage of energy and conversion of energy, namely heating devices in the nature of heat pumps, vapor generating devices with heat pumps, cooling devices with heat pumps, drying and ventilating devices with heat pumps, heat pumps, evaporators for heat pumps, liquefiers for heat pumpsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037maintenance of technical installations for use of energy in the nature of installations for the purpose of heating, vapor generation, cooling, drying, ventilation, storage of energy and conversion of energy, namely heat pumps, vapor generators, coolers, dryers, ventilators, energy storages and energy convertersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042development of technical installations for use of energy, in the nature of installations for the purpose of heating, vapor generation, cooling, drying, ventilation, storage of energy and conversion of energy, namely heat pumps, vapor generators, coolers, dryers, ventilators, energy storages and energy convertersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 26, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 19, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 18, 2014OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2014OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 17, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2012RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2012RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2012RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 8, 2012RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2012MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2012REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance