USPTO serial 79116406
DELAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2026 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 16, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |