USPTO serial 79116491
QIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication servers and related software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |